How Buddhism Flourished throughout the World
Buddhism never developed a missionary movement, Buddha’s teachings
nevertheless spread far and wide on the Indian Subcontinent and from
there throughout Asia. In each new culture it reached, the Buddhist
methods and styles were modified to fit the local mentality, without
compromising the essential points of wisdom and compassion. Buddhism,
however, never developed an overall hierarchy of religious authority
with a supreme head. Each country to which it spread developed its own
forms, its own religious structure and its own spiritual head. The most
well-known and internationally respected of these authorities at present
is His Holiness the Dalai Lama of Tibet.
There are two major divisions of Buddhism. The Hinayana, or
Modest Vehicle, emphasizes personal liberation, while the Mahayana,
or Vast Vehicle, stresses working to become a fully enlightened Buddha
in order to be best able to help others. Each has many sub-divisions.
At present, however, three major forms survive: one Hinayana, known
as Theravada, in South East Asia, and two Mahayana, namely the Chinese
and Tibetan traditions.
The Theravada tradition spread from India to Sri Lanka and Burma in
the third century B.C.E., and from there to Yunnan in southwest China,
Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, South Vietnam and Indonesia. Pockets of Indian
merchants practicing Buddhism were soon found on the coast of the Arabian
Peninsula and even as far as Alexandria, Egypt. Other forms of Hinayana
spread from that time to modern-day Pakistan, Kashmir, Afghanistan,
eastern and coastal Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. These
were the ancient states of Gandhara, Bactria, Parthia and Sogdia. From
this base in Central Asia, they spread further in the second century
C.E. to East Turkistan (Xinjiang) and Inner China, and in the late seventh
century to Kyrghyzstan and Kazakhstan. These forms of Hinayana were
later combined with Mahayana aspects that also came from India so that
Mahayana eventually became the dominant form of Buddhism in most of
Central Asia.
The Chinese form of Mahayana later spread to Korea, Japan and North
Vietnam. Another early wave of Mahayana, mixed with Shaivite
forms of Hinduism, spread from India to Nepal, Indonesia, Malaysia and
parts of South East Asia starting in about the fifth century. The Tibetan
Mahayana tradition, which, starting in the seventh century,
inherited the full historical development of Indian Buddhism, spread
throughout the Himalayan regions and to Mongolia, East Turkistan, Kyrghyzstan,
Kazakhstan, northern Inner China, Manchuria, Siberia and the Kalmyk
Mongol region near the Caspian Sea in European Russia.
The Manner in Which Buddhism Spread
The expansion of Buddhism throughout most of Asia was peaceful and
occurred in several ways. Shakyamuni Buddha set the precedent. Being
primarily a teacher, he traveled to nearby kingdoms to share his insights
with those who were receptive and interested. Likewise, he instructed
his monks to go forth in the world and expound his teachings. He did
not ask others to denounce and give up their own religion and convert
to a new one, for he was not seeking to establish his own religion.
He was merely trying to help others overcome the unhappiness and suffering
that they were creating for themselves because of their lack of understanding.
Later generations of followers were inspired by Buddha’s example and
shared with others his methods that they found useful in their lives.
This is how what is now called "Buddhism" spread far
and wide.
Sometimes the process evolved organically. For example, when Buddhist
merchants visited and settled in different lands, some members of the
local populations naturally developed interest in these foreigners’
beliefs, as with the introduction of Islam to Indonesia and Malaysia.
Such a process occurred with Buddhism in the oasis states along the
Silk Route in Central Asia during the two centuries before and after
the common era. As local rulers and their people learned more about
this Indian religion, they invited monks from the merchants’ native
regions as advisors or teachers and, in this manner, eventually adopted
the Buddhist faith. Another organic method was through the slow cultural
assimilation of a conquering people, such as the Greeks into the Buddhist
society of Gandhara in present-day central Pakistan during the centuries
following the second century B.C.E.
Often, however, the dissemination was due primarily to the influence
of a powerful monarch who had adopted and supported Buddhism himself.
In the mid-third century B.C.E, for example, Buddhism spread throughout
northern India as the result of the personal endorsement of King Ashoka.
This great empire-builder did not force his subjects to adopt the Buddhist
faith. But by posting edicts engraved on iron pillars throughout his
realm exhorting his people to lead an ethical life and by following
these principles himself, he inspired others to adopt Buddha’s teachings.
King Ashoka also actively proselytized outside his kingdom by sending
missions to distant lands. On some occasions, he acted upon the invitation
of foreign rulers, such as King Tishya of Sri Lanka. On others, he sent
monks as envoys at his own initiative. These visiting monastic, however,
did not forcefully pressure others to convert, but simply made Buddha’s
teachings available, allowing people to choose for themselves. This
is evidenced by the fact that in such places as South India and southern
Burma, Buddhism soon took root, while in others, such as the Greek states
in Central and West Asia, there is no record of any immediate impact.
Other religious kings, such as the sixteenth century Mongol potentate
Altan Khan, invited Buddhist teachers to their realm
and proclaimed Buddhism the official creed of the land
in order to help unify their people and consolidate their rule. In the
process they may have prohibited certain practices of non-Buddhist,
indigenous religions and even persecuted those who followed them, but
these heavy-handed moves were primarily politically motivated. Such
ambitious rulers never forced their subjects to adopt Buddhist forms
of belief or worship. This is not part of the religious creed.